According to a recent survey of company executives who pursued an outsourcing strategy, the number one reason for BPO/ offshore investments was expected cost savings. Yet, 25% of those services who outsourced saw no change in costs. Among those who did reduce costs by outsourcing, the average savings was 19%, well short of the high hopes that typically motivate a BPO strategy. Common factors that affect savings include miscommunication, service quality, & security.
However, not outsourcing is even riskier. The competitive environment has become harsher as a result of a historic market depression. Global competition & automated service processes (software driven) have made it even harder for businesses to strengthen their ROI. The most efficient producer is the one who successfully weaves together the best and lowest-cost segment within their company to the finished product.
The risk(s) of offshore investments segments can be assessed, managed, and controlled through proper strategy & service implementation. Independent outsourcing surveyor, Ventoro Institute, found that the leading causes of failure were a lack of preparation by the American purchaser, exclusion of a joint- operation & communication map, and outsourcing the wrong service segment. Each could be avoided with greater diligence on the part of the outsourcing client. "As a rule of thumb, the outsourcing buyer should be the one pushing for greater clarity throughout the entire engagement".
Ventoro estimates that proper service strategy could lead to cost savings of 30%, or greater. So, how do you select a strong BPO vendor?
This article is free for republishing
Source: http://dpstech.articlealley.com/outsourcing-can-define-your-company-fate-so-look-before-you-leap-1250521.html